Blog Post

Taking a peek at how teams are doing on 4th downs

Patrick Barlow • September 30, 2022

Does it feel like teams are going for it more on 4th down than normal? If you said "yes", you're right, but not by as much as you might think. Here's a peek into how teams are approaching 4th downs through week 4.


4th Down Stats

Through 4 weeks, FBS teams have gone for it on 4th downs 967 times, or an average of 1.84 times per game, an increase of 0.2 attempts per game (116 attempts total) from the first 4 weeks of 2021. However, the overall efficiency has lowered almost 1% from 54.6% to 53.7%. Even with this drop in conversion efficiency, the sheer volume of attempts is making up for it. 4th down conversions have increased from 0.9 per game to 1.0 per game.


Some teams have embraced this new philosophy more than others. No team has gone for it more than 16 times so far this year. 13 teams have gone for it 13+ times. Notably, those teams have a combined record of 15-39 (27.8%).


Others either haven't embraced this philosophy or simply haven't needed to. Only 1 team has yet to go for it on 4th down (Texas A&M), while 16 have gone for it 3 or fewer times. These teams have a combined record of 47-16 (74.6%).

Field Goal Stats

In this same timeframe, field goal attempts have lowered, as would be expected. Through the first 4 weeks, teams are only kicking 1.4 field goals per game, the lowest that's been since at least 2004 (the first year I have data for). However, kickers are doing more with their opportunities, raising their field goal % from 74.8% to 75.1%, the highest it's been since at least 2004.


John Hoyland of Wyoming has taken better advantage of his opportunities than most, going 12/13 so far this year. Meanwhile, no kicker has been less effective than Marshall Meeder for Central Michigan (minimum of 3 attempts), kicking 1/5 this season.

Punting Stats

So we know that teams are going for it more, and therefore kicking fewer field goals, but what about punting? In this timeframe, punts per game have dropped significantly. In the first 4 weeks of 2021, teams punted 5.1 times per game. In 2022, teams are only punting 4.2 times per game. Despite the drop in opportunities, punters have seen little change in their efficiency. Yards per punt is down .5 yards. % of punts inside the 20 is down from 34.5% to 33.8%, while touchbacks have also dropped from 7.1% to 6.2%.


No teams have been more effective punting the ball than the Marshall Thundering Herd and Iowa Hawkeyes (minimum 10 punts). 14 of Marshall's 21 punts (~67%) have been downed inside the 20, while 17 of Iowa's 28 punts (~60%) have been downed inside the 20. Iowa has also had 5 punts go into the endzone for touchbacks.


Nobody is punting farther than Michigan State's Bryce Baringer, though. He leads the nation with 52.1 yards per punt (minimum 10 punts), nearly 10 yards better than the national average of 42.3. On the opposite end of the spectrum, CJ Kolodziey of UMass is averaging only 32.3 yards per punt, more than 4 yards worse than the next lowest (minimum 10 punts).

What does it mean?

All this data points to a few things:

  1. Teams are more likely to go for it on 4th down than ever before
  2. The best teams, however, don't need to go for it on 4th down to be the best
  3. Kickers are kicking better this year than any year previously
  4. Punters are getting fewer opportunities, but punting farther because of that

Follow us today!

A punter punting a football
By Patrick Barlow October 4, 2023
Punting is a unique aspect of football. In a perfect game, it would never happen. A punter ideally shouldn't get any playing time. Punters most often get noticed because of a mistake. When was the last time you heard about a game-winning punt? Can you recall a time a punter was named MVP of a game? And yet, a great punter is a game-changer. The ability to flip the field is an underappreciated aspect of the sport. Perhaps this is why there is a distinct lack of advanced punting stats. While advanced stats may not help how punting is perceived, it certainly can't hurt.
By Patrick Barlow November 14, 2022
Each week during the college football season, we'll come here to react to the new TRAM Top 25. TRAM, like most models and systems, gets better and more accurate as the season progresses.
By Patrick Barlow November 7, 2022
Each week during the college football season, we'll come here to react to the new TRAM Top 25. TRAM, like most models and systems, gets better and more accurate as the season progresses.
By Patrick Barlow October 31, 2022
Each week during the college football season, we'll come here to react to the new TRAM Top 25. TRAM, like most models and systems, gets better and more accurate as the season progresses.
By Patrick Barlow October 28, 2022
Predictions are part of what makes college football so fun as a fan. The problem is this sport is wildly unpredictable outside of a handful of teams. If a single game is so hard to predict, how can you predict an entire season? Here's a secret: you don't; you let your computer do it for you. That's exactly what I did. Using TRAM as a base, I simulated the remainder of the 2022 regular season of college football, including conference championship games. Each game was simulated several hundred times to give us the most accurate information. You can find the final standings based on this simulation by pressing this link . This simulation was originally run on 10/26/2022.
By Patrick Barlow October 24, 2022
Each week during the college football season, we'll come here to react to the new TRAM Top 25. TRAM, like most models and systems, gets better and more accurate as the season progresses.
By Patrick Barlow October 17, 2022
Each week during the college football season, we'll come here to react to the new TRAM Top 25. TRAM, like most models and systems, gets better and more accurate as the season progresses.
By Patrick Barlow October 10, 2022
Each week during the college football season, we'll come here to react to the new TRAM Top 25. TRAM, like most models and systems, gets better and more accurate as the season progresses.
By Patrick Barlow October 8, 2022
In part 1 of this series , I looked at which teams were upset the most. In the end, the Oregon Ducks were crowned the Most Overrated Team. Now it's time to look at everyone's favorite teams: the underdogs that pulled it off. Once again, I'll show you the data in 2 ways. First, I'll show which teams have pulled off the most upsets in total. Second, I'll show which teams have the best Upset %, which is the % of times they pulled off the upset when in a position to do so. I'll also filter out teams that have been underdogs fewer than 20 times for 1998+ data and 6 times for 2014+ data. In part 1, I defined an upset as a game in which: an unranked opponent beats a ranked opponent, or a ranked opponent beats an opponent ranked more than 2 spots higher than them (for example, #4 over #1 is an upset, but #3 over #1 is not) I will continue to use this definition. I'm also still using only the AP Poll. With that, let's look at the underdogs.
By Patrick Barlow October 5, 2022
Everyone loves watching them. They're part of what makes college sports so great. They're also elusive. After all, there's a reason one team is the favorite and the other isn't. I'm talking about upsets. Here I'll take a look at which college football teams are upset the most. In part 2, I'll look at which teams pull off the most upsets. Before proceeding, I need to point out that there is an inherent flaw in simply looking at the number of times a team has been upset. The more a team has been ranked, the more often their chances of being upset are. Because of this, I'll show how many times a team has been ranked, how many times they've been upset, and their upset % (% of weeks ranked ending in an upset). I'll also filter out teams that have been ranked less than 20% of the time (rounded up). First, what is an upset? I've defined an upset for the purposes of this article as a game in which: an unranked opponent beats a ranked opponent, or a ranked opponent beats an opponent ranked more than 2 spots higher than them (for example, #4 over #1 is an upset, but #3 over #1 is not) For ranking purposes and consistency, I'm only using the AP Poll. Note also, that the "Weeks Ranked" does not include postseason rankings, since teams can't be upset after the season ends. I've gathered data as far back as 1998, the beginning of the BCS/CFP era. I'll break this down a few ways and see if I can't find some trends.
Show More
Share by: